<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pirates of the Caribbean 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/</link>
	<description>Helping Clog Up The Internet Since 2002</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-8192</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-8192</guid>
		<description>The first Pirates of the Caribbean was great in every way, the best part of the other two was the special effects… the question now is, if they come out with a fourth, will it maintain the quality of the first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first Pirates of the Caribbean was great in every way, the best part of the other two was the special effects… the question now is, if they come out with a fourth, will it maintain the quality of the first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Other michael</title>
		<link>http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6496</link>
		<dc:creator>the Other michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6496</guid>
		<description>Still, it was far, far better than Shrek 3, which I had the misfortune of seeing a few weeks back.

PotC3 at least had gogeous textures, throughout. Verbinski has this inordinate fear of clean, smooth surfaces....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, it was far, far better than Shrek 3, which I had the misfortune of seeing a few weeks back.</p>
<p>PotC3 at least had gogeous textures, throughout. Verbinski has this inordinate fear of clean, smooth surfaces&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Simspon</title>
		<link>http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6437</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Simspon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6437</guid>
		<description>We saw it last week.  I found it....long.  Needed editing.  And the multiple Jack's was just, well, gratouitous.  And that was the biggest credit list of any movie i have ever been to.  ANd not worth sitting through for the blah special scene.  Ten bucks says they ruin the francise with a #4 that centers around the kid- like they ruined The Mummy Returns.  

Auntie Jenny and I are going to see "Knocked Up" this week.  WIl review later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We saw it last week.  I found it&#8230;.long.  Needed editing.  And the multiple Jack&#8217;s was just, well, gratouitous.  And that was the biggest credit list of any movie i have ever been to.  ANd not worth sitting through for the blah special scene.  Ten bucks says they ruin the francise with a #4 that centers around the kid- like they ruined The Mummy Returns.  </p>
<p>Auntie Jenny and I are going to see &#8220;Knocked Up&#8221; this week.  WIl review later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srah</title>
		<link>http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6425</link>
		<dc:creator>srah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6425</guid>
		<description>That explanation ruined the end for me.  I was happy that it had a bittersweet ending and now it's all romantic and junk.  BOO!  I was hoping he would just come back once every 10 years to impregnate her with another kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That explanation ruined the end for me.  I was happy that it had a bittersweet ending and now it&#8217;s all romantic and junk.  BOO!  I was hoping he would just come back once every 10 years to impregnate her with another kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randee</title>
		<link>http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6423</link>
		<dc:creator>Randee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://verybigblog.com/2007/06/04/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3/#comment-6423</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with what you said. And thanks for putting that explanation of the ending up! I thought they were going to be trapped in that 10 year thing forever.

But where did you find that quote? Do you still have the link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with what you said. And thanks for putting that explanation of the ending up! I thought they were going to be trapped in that 10 year thing forever.</p>
<p>But where did you find that quote? Do you still have the link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
