Talk about a flip-flop
Posted by jen September 30th, 2004 in Media Junkie.Don’t like Bush, but you are choosing the path of least evil and voting Kerry despite you don’t like him either? Join up at Kerry Haters for Kerry.
I’ll freely admit I’m not tickled pink over Kerry, but I don’t dislike him either. (John Edwards however is pretty hot for a 50 year old babyface politico.) I think the word I am looking for is “meh”.
Lacking other viable options, he gets my wholehearted support because I’m fairly sure, unlike his competition, he’s not possessed by Dark King Lucifer.
I think a lot of it is the midwestern disdain for New Englanders (Sorry Dave. You guys think we’re redneck uncivilized yokels and we think you’re pompous effete douchebags - for the most part anyway. Dave does not fit into this model, BTW)
There I’ve said it. Go Kerry!
8 Responses to “Talk about a flip-flop”
Leave a Reply
Hmmm. So you’re basing your decision on a gut feeling that one candidate is the incarnation of ‘evil’, and therefore that makes his competitor a better choice.
Evil.
I suppose liberating Europe would have been equally considered the work of Lucifer as well.
You’re free to vote for whomever you wish, with whatever reasoning you choose to use. But somehow I can’t fathom any logic to support your decision.
I don’t belive Bush “liberating (ie Occupying) Iraq” was out of any humaitarian effort.
Kosovo was a humantarian liberation. Sudan would be. Iraq is not.
1: Iraq has oil, Lots of it, he’s from an oil family, with Oil backers, and oil investors. Oil poil oil is whay wer are there along with
2: Daddy. Daddy couldn’t get rid of bad man, bad man tried to kill daddy - he’ll show the bad bad man! Bad man die! die!
Yes Sadaam was a bad guy, I know that, but invading and occupying for the wrong reasons is just as bad. He lied about why he had to go get the bad guy, he drug us into a war we didn’t need to be in becasue of OIL - pure and simple. As Kerry said the first thing they did was secure the oil ministry and the oil fields, I’m sure that was just coincedence.
3: OSAMA Attacked us, Sadaam just stuck his fingers in his ears and stuck his tongue out. He did a hell of of slieght of hand to get us into Iraq to find a saudi in Afganistan.
Lying is why folks wanted Clinton out, lying, impropriety and unmitigated gall, well that’s why I want Bush out. AS I said before, no one died over a blow job, he lied becasue he’s married, (any man would) but people die when bombed by peopel who do not want us there and hate us and never asked for our help and want us gone.
Bush evil working for his own reasons, for his own investments and under other’s influence to get our soliders killed in an unnessary war to secure something for his ego and huge american corporate oil interests and lie the entire time about everything - deny, lie and fry - yes I think he’s evil. hell yes I do. he just hasn’t friend a baby yet. YET.
oh and 4: ripping away rights from the people he’s serving, and alienating the world.
Previewing Your Comment on “Talk about a flip-flop”…
1: Oil: Assuming this is correct, and that the whole Bush family is corrupt, we could have rolled through in ‘91. We didn’t.
2: Bush 41 couldn’t roll into Iraq then, because the UN resolution was to push them out of Kuwait and stop. So Bush 41 did what the UN said they could, and you fault him. Bush 43 followed the UN resolutions (all 17) and you fault him. Are you certain you aren’t simply partisan?
2a: >>Yes Sadaam was a bad guy, I know that, but invading and occupying for the wrong reasons is just as bad. He lied about why he had to go get the bad guy, he drug us into a war we didn’t need to be in becasue of OIL - pure and simple.
Bush Doctrine: Those who fund, support, or harbor terrorists will be dealt with. Iraq did all three.
>> As Kerry said the first thing they did was secure the oil ministry and the oil fields, I’m sure that was just coincedence.
Here the Senator was correct: the fastest way to get money flowing INTO Iraq to help pay for reconstruction is oil. Why else would the terrorists bomb the fields/pipelines so often?
3: See 2A above.
The UN said Iraq had WMD (and has never recanted that position; ask Hans Blix), UK Intel said they had WMD. France, Israeli, Russian Intel: all agreed. US Intel said it too (ask Sen. Kerry, who sat on Senate Intel Committee). So all of them are liars too, right?
>>AS I said before, no one died over a blow job, he lied becasue he’s married, (any man would)
Not any man. I wouldn’t, but then I wouldn’t do what he did. But lets not digress further.
>> but people die when bombed by peopel who do not want us there and hate us and never asked for our help and want us gone.
So I suppose German civilians in WWII were in this same category? Also the Japanese? What about the residents of Georgia during the Civil War?
>>Bush evil working for his own reasons, for his own investments and under other’s influence to get our soliders killed in an unnessary war to secure something for his ego and huge american corporate oil interests and lie the entire time about everything - deny, lie and fry - yes I think he’s evil. hell yes I do. he just hasn’t friend a baby yet. YET.
Previewing Your Comment on “Talk about a flip-flop”…
1: Oil: Assuming this is correct, and that the whole Bush family is corrupt, we could have rolled through in ‘91. We didn’t.
2: Bush 41 couldn’t roll into Iraq then, because the UN resolution was to push them out of Kuwait and stop. So Bush 41 did what the UN said they could, and you fault him. Bush 43 followed the UN resolutions (all 17) and you fault him. Are you certain you aren’t simply partisan?
2a: >>Yes Sadaam was a bad guy, I know that, but invading and occupying for the wrong reasons is just as bad. He lied about why he had to go get the bad guy, he drug us into a war we didn’t need to be in becasue of OIL - pure and simple.
Bush Doctrine: Those who fund, support, or harbor terrorists will be dealt with. Iraq did all three.
>> As Kerry said the first thing they did was secure the oil ministry and the oil fields, I’m sure that was just coincedence.
Here the Senator was correct: the fastest way to get money flowing INTO Iraq to help pay for reconstruction is oil. Why else would the terrorists bomb the fields/pipelines so often?
3: See 2A above.
The UN said Iraq had WMD (and has never recanted that position; ask Hans Blix), UK Intel said they had WMD. France, Israeli, Russian Intel: all agreed. US Intel said it too (ask Sen. Kerry, who sat on Senate Intel Committee). So all of them are liars too, right?
>>AS I said before, no one died over a blow job, he lied becasue he’s married, (any man would)
Not any man. I wouldn’t, but then I wouldn’t do what he did. But lets not digress further.
>> but people die when bombed by peopel who do not want us there and hate us and never asked for our help and want us gone.
So I suppose German civilians in WWII were in this same category? Also the Japanese? What about the residents of Georgia during the Civil War?
>>Bush evil working for his own reasons, for his own investments and under other’s influence to get our soliders killed in an unnessary war to secure something for his ego and huge american corporate oil interests and lie the entire time about everything - deny, lie and fry - yes I think he’s evil. hell yes I do. he just hasn’t friend a baby yet. YET.
Something happened in my last comment post. Let me try this again (and please delete the previous):
1: Oil: Assuming this is correct, and that the whole Bush family is corrupt, we could have rolled through in ‘91. We didn’t.
2: Bush 41 couldn’t roll into Iraq then, because the UN resolution was to push them out of Kuwait and stop. So Bush 41 did what the UN said they could, and you fault him. Bush 43 followed the UN resolutions (all 17) and you fault him. Are you certain you aren’t simply partisan?
2a: >>Yes Sadaam was a bad guy, I know that, but invading and occupying for the wrong reasons is just as bad. He lied about why he had to go get the bad guy, he drug us into a war we didn’t need to be in becasue of OIL - pure and simple.
Bush Doctrine: Those who fund, support, or harbor terrorists will be dealt with. Iraq did all three.
>> As Kerry said the first thing they did was secure the oil ministry and the oil fields, I’m sure that was just coincedence.
Here the Senator was correct: the fastest way to get money flowing INTO Iraq to help pay for reconstruction is oil. Why else would the terrorists bomb the fields/pipelines so often?
3: See 2A above.
The UN said Iraq had WMD (and has never recanted that position; ask Hans Blix), UK Intel said they had WMD. France, Israeli, Russian Intel: all agreed. US Intel said it too (ask Sen. Kerry, who sat on Senate Intel Committee). So all of them are liars too, right?
>>AS I said before, no one died over a blow job, he lied becasue he’s married, (any man would)
Not any man. I wouldn’t, but then I wouldn’t do what he did. But lets not digress further.
>> but people die when bombed by peopel who do not want us there and hate us and never asked for our help and want us gone.
So I suppose German civilians in WWII were in this same category? Also the Japanese? What about the residents of Georgia during the Civil War?
>>Bush evil working for his own reasons, for his own investments and under other’s influence to get our soliders killed in an unnessary war to secure something for his ego and huge american corporate oil interests and lie the entire time about everything - deny, lie and fry - yes I think he’s evil. hell yes I do. he just hasn’t friend a baby yet. YET.
>>Bush evil working for his own reasons, for his own investments and under other’s influence to get our soliders killed in an unnessary war to secure something for his ego and huge american corporate oil interests and lie the entire time about everything - deny, lie and fry - yes I think he’s evil. hell yes I do. he just hasn’t friend a baby yet. YET.
(Obviously I am having a problem with this script; please excuse the redundence)
So it the President acting on his own interest or others influence? Is he an evil genius or an idiot?
Please accept my apologies for the redunent comment posts.